Figures and bank status verified against publicly available sources as of September 2026; the EU-licence status of AMINA, Bank Frick and Sygnum re-checked against regulator and company sources in October 2026. Bank policies and thresholds change β confirm directly with each institution before making decisions.
The pitch sounds clean: Switzerland has FINMA-licensed banks that actually understand crypto. You can hold BTC and CHF in the same place, have your assets genuinely segregated under Swiss law β a protection FINMA reinforced in its January 2026 custody guidance β and not worry that your bank will freeze your account the moment it sees an on-chain transfer.
That pitch is true. But there is a fork in the road most coverage skips: “crypto-friendly bank in Switzerland” now means two completely different things. One is the handful of high-threshold, crypto-native banks β AMINA, Sygnum, Bank Frick β built for six-figure-plus relationships. The other is a fast-growing mainstream tier β Swissquote, Yuh, PostFinance and the cantonal banks β that any Swiss resident can open with a four-figure balance, with UBS reported to be preparing a version of the same thing for selected private-banking clients. As of 2026, roughly 20 Swiss banks offer regulated crypto services across about 2.5 million accounts, the most of any country. Most people searching for a “crypto-friendly Swiss bank account” actually want that second tier.
This field note covers both β starting with the mainstream tier most readers can actually use, then the crypto-native institutions, the thresholds, the KYC depth, and the honest list of who each is really designed to serve.
The Tier Most People Actually Want: Mainstream Banks with Crypto Access
If you hold a mid-five-figure amount of crypto and just want a regulated Swiss bank that lets you buy, hold, and sell it, you do not need a crypto-native bank. Since 2024 crypto has quietly become a standard product at mainstream Swiss institutions, and the entry requirements look nothing like the ones further down this page.
Swissquote β the practical default for most individuals. FINMA-regulated, listed on the Swiss stock exchange, and the first Swiss bank to offer Bitcoin trading, back in 2017. It now supports more than 50 cryptocurrencies as real holdings β actual coins in segregated custody under Swiss banking law, not derivatives β and the minimum deposit for Swiss residents is CHF 1,000. Crypto is a real but cyclical part of its business: net crypto asset income was CHF 85.7 million in 2025, roughly 12% of the group’s CHF 724.2 million operating income β and then fell 66% year-on-year in the first half of 2026, to CHF 14.6 million, enough for the group to cut its 2026 guidance.
Yuh β the mobile-first option. Launched in 2021 as a joint venture between PostFinance and Swissquote β and wholly owned by Swissquote since PostFinance sold its 50% stake in July 2025 β the Yuh app bundles payments, saving, investing, and access to around 34 cryptocurrencies in one place. It reached roughly 340,000 customers in about four years, which tells you how much appetite there is for crypto access that does not involve a private-banking onboarding.
PostFinance and the cantonal banks β the incumbents. PostFinance, a systemically important state-owned bank, launched crypto trading in 2024 (routed through Swissquote infrastructure) and opened tens of thousands of crypto custody accounts in its first year. Several cantonal banks β ZΓΌrcher Kantonalbank, plus Luzerner, St.Galler, and Zuger Kantonalbank β now offer Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, typically powered behind the scenes by Sygnum’s or AMINA’s custody rails. For an existing customer, crypto is often just a new tab in the same banking app.
UBS β the one to watch. In January 2026 Bloomberg reported that UBS, historically one of the most conservative names in wealth management, was preparing to let selected private-banking clients in Switzerland buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum directly. UBS itself would only say it was exploring the initiative, and I have not been able to find a confirmation that the service actually went live β so treat this as reported intent, not an open door. The signal still matters: the country’s largest bank has stopped treating crypto as off-limits.
| Bank | Type | Entry point | Crypto range | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swissquote | Listed FINMA bank | CHF 1,000 min. deposit | 50+ coins | Individuals wanting a full trading account |
| Yuh | App (Swissquote-owned, ex-PostFinance JV) | Standard app signup | ~34 coins | Mobile-first, small balances |
| PostFinance | State-owned bank | Existing account | BTC/ETH+ via Swissquote | Existing customers wanting one tab |
| Cantonal banks (ZKB, Luzerner, St.Galler, Zuger) | Cantonal banks | Existing account | BTC/ETH (Sygnum/AMINA rails) | Residents already banking cantonally |
| UBS | Global wealth bank | Private-banking client | BTC/ETH (reported, selected clients) | Existing UBS wealth clients |
The trade-off with this tier is depth: you generally get trading and custody β plus staking on a handful of major coins at Swissquote and PostFinance β but not lending, tokenization, or bespoke institutional structuring. For most individuals, that is exactly enough. The crypto-native banks below exist for the cases where it is not.
The Crypto-Native Tier: Banks Built Around Digital Assets
Now the other end of the market. Switzerland has four institutions that sit in the “crypto-native or crypto-serious bank” category β built from the ground up around digital assets rather than bolting crypto onto a traditional bank:
AMINA Bank (formerly SEBA Bank) β received its FINMA banking licence in August 2019 alongside Sygnum. Rebranded from SEBA to AMINA in December 2023. Headquartered in Zug. Offers trading, custody, lending, and staking for a range of crypto-assets. In November 2025 it announced that it had become the first crypto banking group to secure a MiCA licence β granted to its Austrian subsidiary by Austria’s FMA in October 2025 β letting it passport services across the EU. One caveat for individuals: that EU offering is aimed at professional investors β family offices, corporates, and institutions β not retail accounts.
Sygnum Bank β also FINMA-licensed since 2019. Based in Zurich. By its own account it managed roughly USD 6 billion in client assets across about 2,300 clients in 80-plus countries at the end of 2025 β Swiss finance press reading the same annual report puts it at CHF 4.6 billion, which is the same money in a different currency. It became a unicorn in January 2025 after a USD 58 million strategic growth round. Its Protect off-exchange custody platform passed USD 1 billion in assets by March 2026, and on 26 February 2026 it launched Sygnum Select, a discretionary mandate service for corporate and crypto-native treasuries. The direction is clear: Sygnum builds for institutions and professional clients, with custody and trading at the core.
Bank Frick β based in Liechtenstein (not Switzerland proper, but regulated by Liechtenstein’s Financial Market Authority, which operates within the Swiss franc zone and EEA). The oldest of the four. Has offered crypto trading and custody since 2017, primarily for financial intermediaries and professional clients. In December 2025 it secured MiCAR authorisation from Liechtenstein’s FMA (in effect since 23 December 2025), letting it passport crypto custody and trading across all 30 EEA states, and it also runs a branch in the Dubai International Financial Centre β so its reach now extends well beyond the Swiss-franc zone. It remains an intermediary- and professional-focused bank, not a retail one.
InCore Bank β a Swiss B2B bank that provides crypto infrastructure to other financial institutions. Not a direct-to-client bank. If you are an individual looking to open an account personally, InCore is not your path β it functions as wholesale infrastructure.
Quick reality check
Of the four names that circulate in "Swiss crypto bank" conversations, one (InCore) is not accessible to individuals at all. That leaves three realistic options β and each has a very different client profile in mind.
What the Minimum Threshold Actually Looks Like
This is where the gap between marketing and reality is widest.
AMINA Bank does not publish a hard minimum deposit figure. What it does publish is the threshold for professional client status β which is a regulatory classification, not an arbitrary number. To qualify, a client needs either:
- Liquid assets of at least CHF 500,000 (excluding real estate, pension assets, and social security claims) plus relevant financial knowledge or professional experience in financial markets, or
- Liquid assets of CHF 2,000,000 or more, regardless of expertise
Clients who do not meet this threshold are classified as retail clients. AMINA can still onboard retail clients, but the product set available to them is meaningfully narrower.
Sygnum’s published materials suggest a minimum portfolio value of CHF 50,000 in crypto assets for custody accounts, though some published reviews put the practical institutional threshold at CHF 100,000 or higher. Sygnum’s fee structure is customized per client and quoted in basis points β which itself signals that the bank is designed for relationships measured in six figures and above, not single-coin retail holders.
Bank Frick’s thresholds are not publicly listed and are negotiated as part of the onboarding process. The bank is explicit that its primary client base is financial intermediaries and professional investors, not retail.
| Bank | FINMA licence | Individual accounts | Approx. AUM/crypto minimum | KYC depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMINA (formerly SEBA) | β Full banking | β Yes (retail + professional) | ~CHF 500K for professional status | Medium-high |
| Sygnum | β Full banking | β Yes (professional clients) | ~CHF 50-100K in crypto | High |
| Bank Frick | β (via Liechtenstein FMA) | β οΈ Limited (intermediaries preferred) | Negotiated, not disclosed | High |
| InCore | β Full banking | β B2B only | β | N/A for individuals |
The KYC Process: What They Actually Ask For
Swiss crypto banking KYC goes several layers deeper than a standard Swiss bank account opening.
Layer 1 β identity and address. Standard across all Swiss banks: valid passport or national ID, proof of address dated within the past three to six months. For non-Swiss residents, an official document showing tax residence. This part is unremarkable.
Layer 2 β source of funds. This is where crypto accounts diverge significantly from fiat-only banking. Banks require documentation showing how the client acquired their crypto assets. Depending on the volume involved, this can include:
- Exchange transaction history (typically 12+ months, sometimes going back further)
- Purchase confirmations and bank transfer records showing fiat-to-crypto conversions
- OTC trade confirmations if assets were acquired over the counter
- Mining revenue documentation if applicable
- Inheritance or gift documentation if assets were received rather than purchased
The completeness of blockchain transaction history is not optional. Gaps in the chain of custody β periods where the bank cannot trace where assets came from or went β are a common reason applications stall or get declined.
Layer 3 β tax compliance. Swiss banks will ask for confirmation that the client has declared their crypto holdings in their home jurisdiction. This has sharpened as the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) approaches β though the timeline slipped. On 26 November 2025 the Swiss Federal Council decided the crypto-reporting provisions would not apply in 2026; implementation is now targeted to start on 1 January 2027 at the earliest, with the first actual exchange of data coming later still. The 74 partner jurisdictions β including all EU states β are a Federal Council proposal, not a settled list: parliament has not approved it, and the National Council’s economic affairs and taxation committee suspended its review of the activation list in November 2025, pending clarity on what other jurisdictions do. None of this means a client needs to have paid tax on unrealized gains β it means the bank needs comfort that the client is not using the account to move undeclared assets. For clients in high-tax jurisdictions, this can involve producing tax returns or a letter from an accountant.
What tends to stop an application
The likeliest failure point is not the identity documents β it is the source-of-funds gap. If your crypto came from multiple exchanges, some of which no longer exist, and you moved assets through several wallets over five years without keeping records, the bank will have difficulty satisfying its AML obligations. "Clean" transaction history β purchased on regulated exchanges, minimal mixer or anonymity-tool exposure, documented β significantly improves the outcome.
Individual vs. Institutional: A Real Difference
The word “individual” is doing a lot of work in Swiss crypto banking.
When AMINA says it accepts individual accounts, it means it can onboard natural persons β not just companies. But the experience of an individual with CHF 800,000 in liquid assets and a clean on-chain history is very different from an individual with CHF 30,000 in ETH and a few years of Binance history.
Sygnum’s stated client base is about 2,300 clients across 80-plus countries. Its own onboarding FAQ lists professional and institutional investors, corporates, DLT companies, banks and other financial institutions β and says it does not onboard retail clients. The bank did not become a unicorn by servicing individual hodlers.
This is not a criticism of either bank. They have a business model, regulatory obligations, and compliance costs that shape who they can profitably serve. It is, however, relevant information for anyone who reads “we accept individual clients” and assumes the door is equally open.
Timeline: How Long Does It Actually Take?
Coincub’s 2026 review of Sygnum notes “lengthy KYC procedures” with extended setup times due to “high KYC/compliance checks.”
The sources cited here do not give a standard onboarding duration for AMINA or Sygnum, so there is no published number to plan around. My judgment, from how the three KYC layers above are built: even a straightforward case β documented history, regulated exchange purchases, professional investor classification β means weeks rather than days. More complex cases β assets acquired across multiple jurisdictions, privacy coin holdings, gaps in transaction history, or assets from now-defunct platforms β can take months, and may not conclude with approval. The practical step is to ask the bank for its current expected timeline at first contact, and to plan any asset transfer around that answer rather than around a fixed date.
Bank Frick, operating as an intermediary-focused bank in Liechtenstein, often works through external asset managers or financial service providers rather than direct-to-client onboarding. The timeline there is typically negotiated alongside a broader client relationship structure.
How This Compares to a Standard Swiss Bank
To calibrate expectations: opening a regular Swiss bank account at a traditional cantonal bank or UBS/PostFinance involves identity verification, proof of address, and tax documentation. The threshold for crypto-related assets? It varies by institution, but many traditional Swiss banks have historically been reluctant to accept clients with significant crypto holdings as a primary wealth source β or have asked them to liquidate before onboarding.
The Swiss crypto-native banks exist precisely because of that gap. They will accept crypto assets as a legitimate part of a client’s portfolio, they will custody them under Swiss law, and they understand the on-chain due diligence requirements. That is genuinely valuable.
The trade-off is that the bar for entry is higher than most retail crypto holders expect, and the cost structure reflects institutional rather than retail banking economics.
What “Crypto-Friendly” Actually Means Here
A useful reframe: “crypto-friendly bank” in the Swiss context means a bank that has built compliance infrastructure around crypto assets, not a bank that asks fewer questions.
These institutions ask more questions than a traditional bank would, because they have to. FINMA expects them to maintain the same anti-money-laundering standards as any other Swiss bank β applied to an asset class that moves on public blockchains where every transaction is traceable but provenance still requires documentation.
The friendliness is in the capability to process crypto assets, not in the willingness to waive scrutiny. That distinction matters for anyone approaching Swiss crypto banking with the expectation of faster onboarding or lighter documentation.
Practical Considerations Before Applying
A few things worth thinking through before starting the process:
Document your transaction history now. Pull full exports from every exchange you have used. If some exchanges have closed, use blockchain explorers to reconstruct your transaction history and keep those exports. The time to do this is before an application, not during it.
Know where your assets came from. If you purchased crypto with savings, have the bank records showing the transfer. If you received crypto as payment, have the contracts or invoices. If you earned through staking or mining, have the income records.
Understand your tax position. Not because these banks will refuse clients who owe tax, but because a client who cannot clearly explain their tax situation raises more questions during KYC than one who can. A letter from a tax advisor in your jurisdiction confirming you have reported your holdings is useful collateral in the application process.
Match the bank to your asset level. If you are holding CHF 20,000 in Bitcoin, the mainstream tier at the top of this note is the place to start. The box above on who crypto-native banks are designed for sets out when moving up makes sense, and the document preparation here pays off at either tier.
Where the Ecosystem Is Going
AMINA’s Austrian MiCA licence, granted in October 2025 and announced that November, is significant. It means the bank can passport crypto custody and trading services across EU member states without needing separate national licences. (Why a Zug bank needs an Austrian licence for that at all is the subject of a separate note: Does MiCA apply in Switzerland?) For clients based in the EU, this changes the accessibility calculus β if your jurisdiction’s crypto banking situation is difficult, a bank with a MiCA passport operating out of Switzerland may offer a path that did not exist two years ago. Bank Frick’s MiCAR authorisation from Liechtenstein’s FMA took effect on 23 December 2025, and Sygnum’s Liechtenstein subsidiary, Sygnum Europe AG, now holds a MiCA licence from the same regulator β listed in France’s public register as providing services there from 30 June 2026 β so AMINA, Bank Frick and Sygnum all now have an EEA-passport route.
The split between institutional and mass-market crypto banking has now clearly arrived. At the institutional end, Sygnum’s unicorn status, USD 6 billion in client assets, and new discretionary-mandate business show the crypto-native banks deepening upmarket. At the mass-market end, the opposite is happening: crypto has become a normal banking product. Roughly 20 Swiss banks β the most of any country β now serve crypto to about 2.5 million accounts, and UBS was reported in January 2026 to be preparing to join them for selected private-banking clients. Retail-accessible crypto banking did come from neobanks, licensed brokers, and incumbent banks rather than the full crypto-native institutions. What is thinning is the middle: as an individual, you are increasingly choosing between a mainstream bank’s crypto tab and a crypto-native bank’s six-figure onboarding, with less and less in between.
For a direct link to the FINMA banking licence history that put AMINA and Sygnum on the map, the FINMA regulatory guidance on crypto custody provides additional context on the legal framework these institutions operate within. The Swiss crypto tax overview is also relevant for anyone thinking through the full picture of holding crypto in Switzerland β the bank account is one piece of a larger structure.
The Honest Summary
Swiss crypto-native banks β AMINA, Sygnum, Bank Frick β are real, well-regulated, and genuinely useful for the right client. The right client is generally not a retail investor with a few years of exchange history and mid-five-figure holdings. For them the floor is higher than the marketing copy suggests, the KYC process is more intensive than most people expect, and the timeline is longer than anyone wants it to be.
But that is only half the picture in 2026, and it is the half most articles stop at. If you are a normal holder who just wants a regulated Swiss home for your crypto, you are not shut out β you are looking at the wrong tier. Open a Swissquote account, use Yuh, or check whether your existing bank now has a crypto tab. The crypto-native banks are for the cases those cannot serve: large balances, lending, tokenization, institutional structuring.
None of this is a failure of the Swiss system. It is the system maturing β a mass-market tier for everyday holders and a crypto-native tier for institutions, both operating within a banking framework that takes its AML obligations seriously. Work out which tier your situation actually calls for, and the path forward is far clearer than “can I even get a Swiss crypto bank account?” makes it sound.
Field note. Not legal or financial advice β conditions change, and bank policies vary. Verify directly with each institution before making decisions.
